all about Madonna

everything you ever wanted to know about the queen of pop

Madonna News

Madonna’s message lost in transformation

So it’s come to this: Madonna, who once writhed her way to R-rated MTV stardom, singing earnest protest anthems.
What next? Madonna writing children’s books?
Oh, wait a minute, she’s already done that.
The singer’s latest career transformation was accompanied by an occasionally dazzling, frequently puzzling, and sometimes ponderous multimedia extravaganza Sunday in the first of four concerts at the United Center.
Even though her latest movie (“Swept Away”) and album (“American Life”) were commercial and critical flops, and even though she’s been challenged by a new crop of tarted-up pop divas, Madonna remains a formidable concert draw.
But the current Reinvention Tour, spread over 21 songs and 105 minutes, is a mess, a hodgepodge of ideas that never quite establishes its tenuous theme: personal reinvention as the key to world peace. There were Cirque du Soleil-like acrobatics from her dancers, moody visuals on a handful of movable screens that suggested the Goth-rock influence of Nine Inch Nails or Depeche Mode, and a bevy of set changes that evoked everything from Louis XIV decadence to Stanley Kubrick’s “Full Metal Jacket.” For longtime Madonna watchers, it simply meant a less-than-satisfying makeover, long on simplistic political themes and short on the old sexed-up dance numbers.
Madonna was never a particularly personable performer; she always kept the audience on a short leash with her dominatrix demeanor. But the singer more than compensated with a subversive sense of humor that, when conspiring with the best of her melodic dance-pop, put a wicked twist on the notion of a “guilty pleasure.” Once she was a female role model of the best sort, a self-possessed hurricane of ambition out to entertain at all costs. Now she’s come down with a bad case of Significance, complete with self-help tips, a cover of John Lennon’s “Imagine” and images of war-torn Third World countries.
It didn’t help that the singer was touring behind her weakest album, “American Life,” which signaled that the Madonna party was definitely over. On this electro-folk sidestep, the erstwhile narcissist had been replaced by a kinder, humbler, more enlightened superstar. Her current tour weaves the gray “American Life” tunes into the fabric of more colorful musical moments from earlier eras.
Madonna is concentrating more than ever on singing. Though her voice was occasionally enhanced by backing vocals, she sounded poised and in tune, her tone warmer, her range broader. Her dance moves have become more stylized and deliberate, less overtly sexual and frantic, presumably to allow her enough room to catch her breath and belt out a forgotten “Evita” ballad such as “Lament.” There were some inspired moments: a splashy entrance for “Vogue”; a new-wave makeover for “Burning Up,” with Madonna strumming rudimentary rhythm guitar; an eerie techno-pop ballad, “Frozen.”
But there were early signs the show was in trouble. The muddled title song of “American Life” was performed in military fatigues, its most memorable moment a closing video image of Saddam Hussein and President Bush look-alikes embracing. An acoustic set, in which Madonna continued her unpromising transformation from dance queen into coffeehouse singer-songwriter, limped along until collapsing with “Mother and Father,” in which the singer tried to rap.
Almost out of desperation, she brought out a high-stepping Scottish bagpiper, right after a Missy Elliot video cameo on “Get into the Groove.” What this had to do with anything was beyond me, but it sure was fun to watch. But just as the concert was starting to regain its balance, it was over in a shower of confetti and one-world bromides during “Holiday.”
“Come together in every nation,” Madonna chirped.
“Reinvent Yourself,” the video screen commanded.
Enough already.
source : chicagotribune.com

Comments

Madonna trades memorable music for gaudy spectacle

Over the course of her two-decade career, Madonna has accomplished many things: She has been a champion button-pusher, a fashion trendsetter and a provocative performance artist.
The 45-year-old singer has also recorded some extraordinary music (along with a fair amount of pop fluff). But judging from her spectacle-laden performance at the United Center on Sunday, that’s the accomplishment she cares about least.
The dance diva’s skimpy 105-minute show — the first of four in Chicago — certainly gave her fans a lot of high-tech, whiz-bang gimmickry for their hard-earned dollars. (The top ticket price: $317.50.) But the music was essentially an afterthought.
Judged against the standards of, say, the Cirque du Soleil, a modern Broadway production or the videos-come-to-life concerts by Madonna offspring such as Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera, it was a heck of a show. But call me old-fashioned: I went for the music. And in this department, the Reinvention Tour needed serious reanimating.
After starting 40 minutes late and turning off the arena’s air-conditioning in order to preserve her platinum pipes, Madonna played a mere 24 songs — that’s counting the ponderous “I am a prophet” faux-Biblical introduction — and she wasn’t even onstage for three of those.
Yes, the set list spanned her career, and she overcame her longstanding reluctance to play her older hits. But several of these were delivered in arrangements that were so bizarre that they played like parodies. That is, unless you agree that bagpipes and martial drummers were always lacking in 1984’s “Into the Groove.”
(What was with the Scottish kilts and the odd choice of sonic filigree? Maddy and British director Guy Ritchie were married in a Scottish castle and like to vacation in the highlands — that’s the only fact that I could find to explain this strange detour, one of several in the show that made no sense to anyone besides the singer’s self-indulgent choreographers, set designers and wardrobe artists.)
“Vogue” was reimagined as a soundtrack for the court of Marie Antoinette; 1983’s “Burning Up” got some incongruous, generic heavy-metal guitar and “Lament” from the musical “Evita” served only to underscore that Madonna was poorly suited to perform in musicals like “Evita.” (And no, the set piece that found her strapped into an electric chair wasn’t enough to distract from her melodramatic crooning.)
The singer also played six songs from last year’s abysmal techno-folkie flop, “American Life.” Contrary to what some critics have said, the material fared no better in concert than it does on the flat and uninspired recording. Madonna continued to overuse the electronic vocoder effect on her voice (perhaps to mask the insipid lyrics), the sultry come-ons of her “Erotica” era were still sorely missed and the show came to a screeching halt with the dumb and stilted rap in the middle of the maudlin “Mother and Father.”
Musically, however, the nadir was an anemic, histrionic and soulless electronic reading of John Lennon’s “Imagine” set to a barrage of video images of children from around the globe plagued by the ravages of hunger and war. (War and hunger = bad! Imagine no possessions = good! That is, after you’ve gone into hock buying concert tickets.)
As a political commentator, Madonna made Bart Simpson seem as sophisticated as Noam Chomsky. And her attempts to enlighten us about her arcane spiritual belief system didn’t fare much better –though she mysteriously traded in her “Kabalists Do It Better” T-shirt for one that read, “Italians Do It Better.”
Imagine no facile preaching from Madonna. It’s easy if you try. Or have you really forgotten the Material Girl who fellated a water bottle in “Truth or Dare” and acted out pretty much every risque fantasy imaginable in her dirty-picture book Sex ?
In the end, if you removed all of the spectacle — the half-pipe skateboard ramp, the bagpipers, the fake explosions, the dancers’ military drills, the descending catwalk and the multiple video screens — you had an aging singer with an impressive catalog and a voice that (at least on the dance numbers) is arguably stronger than it’s ever been.
Sadly, Madonna lacked enough faith in these assets to rely on them being enough to entertain us. Instead, she beat us over the heads with yet another dizzying and superfluous MTV-style visual assault.
The most radical reinvention that Madonna could have chosen at this point in her career was to simply emphasize the music. (You know, that stuff that “makes the people come together/Music makes the bourgeoisie and the rebels/ Think of yesterday.”)
Believe it or not, Maddy, it’s your music that will endure when all the rest is gone, after the last bagpiper has hung up his kilt and the skateboarder no longer has enough hair to grow a Mohawk.
source : suntimes.com

Comments

Madonna’s house on sale

The Michigan home where Madonna was raised is up for sale for only $300,000 dollars. The house was once priced in the millions on Ebay, thanks to some pranksters but realtors put a stop to that. The four-bedroom home is located in Rochester Hills, a suburb of Detroit .
source : wabc

Comments

Who’s that girl this time around?

The irony of Madonna calling her current jaunt the “Re-invention Tour” is rich — the singer has spent her entire career reinventing herself.
Pop’s wiliest female chameleon followed in the footsteps of Andy Warhol and David Bowie as a deft appropriator of underground ideas who has always excelled at taking those notions into the mainstream. For 20 years, she has changed with each new album and tour, expertly staying one step ahead of the times and the trends.
Now, at age 45, Madonna is at a difficult crossroads: How does she remain relevant and seem fresh and exciting when her primary role as a sexy dance diva and sultry provocateur has long since been usurped by a new generation of younger, chirpier and even more risque sirens?
Chicago fans will have the opportunity to witness her latest transmogrification when she performs at the United Center tonight and tomorrow and again on Wednesday and Thursday — that is, if they can afford the steep ticket price, which is $317.50 with Ticketmaster “convenience fees” for much of the arena. (Scattered seats remain; call 312-559-1212 or visit www.ticketmaster.com.)
Maddy has been laying the groundwork for a shift in perceptions about her public persona for some time now. Over the last decade, she successfully emerged as a brilliant businesswoman, serving as the nominal head of Maverick Records (the label that gave us Alanis Morissette, the Deftones and the Prodigy, among others), though the company was recently bought out by the Warner Music Group.
Her film career has been more of a mixed bag. (Anybody remember “Swept Away”? How about “Shanghai Surprise”? Didn’t think so.) But on the personal front, she at long last settled down with her director husband, Guy Ritchie, embracing the role of mother and branching out as an author of children’s books. And she has made a big deal out of her spiritual reawakening via her study of Kabbalah, a form of Jewish mysticism.
Madonna hasn’t fared nearly as well when it comes to reinventing her music. Her last concert jaunt, the 2001 Drowned World Tour, found her awkwardly avoiding the hits from the first two-thirds of her career, leaving some fans grumbling and drawing criticism for seeming “distant and removed” onstage (as if she was ever a particularly engaging and personable performer — she has always seemed to be acting out scenes from her videos rather than living in the moment on stage).
The singer’s last new album, 2003’s “American Life” — her 14th studio effort overall — was a soggy commercial and critical disappointment. She turned away from the playful techno sounds that powered 1998’s “Ray of Light” and 2000’s “Music” in favor of more static electronic backings, way too much acoustic guitar and some very stilted rapping. And for once she seemed oddly out of touch with the pop zeitgeist.
“I don’t know who I am — I don’t know who I’m supposed to be,” she crooned in “X-Static Process,” and that statement seemed to sum up her general artistic confusion.
The former Madonna Louise Veronica Ciccone of Bay City, Mich., tries to resuscitate “American Life” by performing six songs from that disc on the Re-invention Tour, and reviewers have claimed that the material holds up better in concert than it did on album. But even more surprising is what’s missing from the show: Namely, the sex.
Like Prince, another controversial, enigmatic and genre-crossing superstar who first made his mark in the ’80s, Madonna has excised most of the R-rated material from her current stage show. There are no conical bras, no acted-out S/M routines and no lascivious voguing (just a lot of tamer posing and some fake yoga moves).
Publicly, Maddy is crediting the change in tone to her spiritual reawakening, just as Prince has cited his conversion as a Jehovah’s Witness. But shrewd performer that she is, she also knows that despite those killer abs, she no longer has the pinup-girl appeal of a Britney Spears or a Christina Aguilera. Tawdry striptease shenanigans would not only appear a bit unseemly now, but maybe even a little ridiculous.
Not that the Re-invention Tour is ultra-serious — far from it.
Among the gaudy spectacles that Madonna offers this time around are a mohawked skateboarder riding a half-pipe ramp set up in the middle of the stage; a V-shaped catwalk that descends from the ceiling of the arena; 10 dancers; five costume changes; three trapeze artists who swing, sway and contort high above the crowd; one tap dancer in white tails and top hat; a troupe of kilt-wearing bagpipers and an apparently striking vignette in which the star is strapped into an electric chair. (Alas, it isn’t really plugged in, and no one pulls the switch.)
What does any of this have to do with anything? Nada, nothing, not a darn thing! But it sure is fun to look at — gosh, golly, gee-whiz!
“Madonna has created a new performance hybrid, one that lifts and blends elements of Broadway, Cirque du Soleil, Rock the Vote rallies, art installations, extreme sporting events, church sermons, disco dances and gun-spinning military drills,” reviewer David Segal wrote in The Washington Post.
That sounds like some kind of an accomplishment. But is it really worth $317.50? And what about the music — isn’t that supposed to be why we care?
Well, yes and no. Madonna’s fans have always attended her concerts as much for her fashion trend-setting, her excessive, “just like the videos” eye candy and her hot-topic button-pushing as for her always-just-passable singing.
Madonna has returned to performing many of her older tunes, and she remakes them with new, relatively stripped-down backings from a lean and mean six-piece band (plus two backing singers) and the huskier vocals that have long since replaced the helium warble of her early years. These MTV staples are interesting primarily because we haven’t heard them for so long, as well as for the fact that she’s added some incongruous touches like the bagpipes and martial drums that now color “Into the Groove.”
Less promising is a mid-evening acoustic set, which consists of “Don’t Tell Me,” “Like a Prayer,” a dreadful rap during “Mother Father” and a misguided cover of John Lennon’s “Imagine,” which is set to a barrage of images of war-ravaged children flashed on the four giant video screens. Which brings us to the button-pushing.
When “American Life” was released last year, Madonna was forced to pull the video for the title track and first single from circulation only days before it was set to premiere on MTV and VH1. Shot by director Jonas Akerlund (who had worked with the Smashing Pumpkins and the Prodigy) before the start of the war in Iraq, it found the star tromping along a fashion runway with dancers dressed in military fatigues.
These scenes were intercut with images of war, and one of several alternate endings found the diva tossing a hand grenade at a look-alike for President Bush. The video was attacked by the press, and Madonna withdrew the clip after the networks implied they wouldn’t air it. It was a rare example of controversy working against the artist rather than for her, as it did with her run-in with the Catholic Church over the clip for “Like a Prayer.”
Nowadays, though, Bush-bashing and anti-war sentiments are all the rage — witness the success of “Fahrenheit 9/11” by director Michael Moore, who sat front and center during one of Madonna’s recent shows at New York’s Madison Square Garden — and the Re-invention Tour is full of video montages of bombed-out villages, not to mention an image of a Dubya look-alike buddying up to a stand-in for Saddam Hussein.
Madonna’s politicking isn’t particularly sophisticated — it’s accompanied by a dance number in which the troupe is clad in camouflage gear and carrying fake rifles — and the most direct commentary that she makes on the subject is the simplistic statement, “Stop all wars!”
As a dictate from the Queen of Pop goes, this isn’t nearly as much fun as “Express yourself” or “Give it up, do as I say” (from “Erotica”). But this is the new, serious and spiritual Madonna. And if you do
n’t really like this year’s model, you probably shouldn’t fret.
She’ll be back to reinvent herself yet again in another year or two.
Just what the heck is Kabbalah?
Throughout the Re-invention Tour, the video screens frequently flash Hebrew letters that are never translated. Madonna wears a symbolic red string around her wrist; she sings the last few songs wearing a T-shirt that reads “Kabbalists Do It Better,” and she’d like us to call her “Esther,” please.
What the heck is she going on about now?
Welcome to the world of Kabbalah — which Madonna, who was raised as a Roman-Catholic, calls her new “punk-rock, anti-establishment” religion.
Kabbalah — which is alternately spelled Cabala, Caballa, Kabala, Kaballa, and Qaballah, thanks to the vagaries of translating Hebrew — is generally interpreted to mean “to receive” or “to accept,” but it is often used synonymously with “tradition.” It refers to a collection of mystical Jewish writings involving symbolical interpretations of Hebrew Scriptures.
Believers hold that these teachings — which involve the nature of divinity, the creation, the origin and fate of the soul and the role of human beings on earth — have been passed on as oral tradition from the mouths of the prophets since the creation of man. But most religious scholars hold that the bulk of them date from the medieval era.
Kabbalah has been trendy among Hollywood types since the mid-’90s. Roseanne has called it “the last hope for the world,” and other adherents have included Elizabeth Taylor, Barbra Streisand and actress Sandra Bernhard (even though women were discouraged from studying the religion until the last century).
“I’m a little bit irritated that people think that it’s like some celebrity bandwagon that I’ve jumped on, or that, say, somebody like Demi [Moore] has jumped on,” Madonna recently said in an interview with ABC-TV’s “20/20.” “We don’t take it lightly.
“Paris Hilton did come to the Kabbalah Centre once, because her parents brought her,” she continued. “They wanted to help her and they were desperate and they brought her there and she had a meeting and she left, and suddenly, Paris Hilton studies Kabbalah. I mean, that’s what happens, and people … they don’t know the whole story.”
In the no-longer-Material Girl’s case, the whole story includes the fact that she was inspired by the religion to change her name in order to draw on a “new source of energy.” Hence the new moniker Esther, from the Biblical tale of a woman of limited means who went on to become queen of Persia and save the Jewish from annihilation.
Oddly enough, there is no mention in the Scriptures of Queen Esther ever having worn a T-shirt proclaiming, “Persians Do It Better.”
source : suntimes.com

Comments

Madonnarama

When Madonna takes the stage this week in Chicago for her Re-Invention tour, it’s a safe bet that most of the fans in the audience will recognize the greatest hits she performs, know the words and sing along to them.
Then there are her uberfans.
A group apart, these fans are united in their love of all things Madonna. They’re the ones who pay big bucks for up-close concert seats, dress up like her and scream their hearts out the moment she comes out for the start of the show. Not only do they know the words to every song, but they also can pinpoint exactly what they were doing in their lives when that particular song was released.
From the teased hair and “Boy Toy” jewelry to the red Kabbalah string bracelet and motherhood, these superfans have stayed true blue to their Material Girl through her 20-year career. It doesn’t matter if her latest album sells 10 million or 2 million copies, or if her movies bomb. To them, Madonna can do no wrong.
“Each time, she’s more fabulous,” said Michelle Flores, 29, at Berlin nightclub in Boystown for a monthly Madonna theme night. “I’ve followed her since the beginning, and the trends she sets are just incredible.”
Flores plans to imitate one of Madonna’s looks – her cone-shaped bustier – when she goes to the Chicago show. Unable to afford couture, Flores and her mother have fashioned a look-alike top out of chicken wire and fabric.

Madonna on cover of RedEye Magazine

source : redeyechicago.com

Comments

Madonna reinvents her hits

The engine of Madonna’s 21-year career is reinvention. Look back and her lineage of videos and concert tours is lined with shifting selves — from disco boy-toy all the way up to children’s book author.
By naming her current tour “Re-Invention,” the 45-year-old is not so much trying anything new as she is, for the first time, collecting all her former selves and seeing if they can co-exist together.
Some call it nostalgia, but Madonna has never been that obvious. At the United Center Sunday, the first of four sold-out nights, she tried to make sense out of everything she’s done in the past, but in the exhilarating collage, she demonstrated some previous lives live up to the present and a few do not. Some reinvention was musical and on these songs, Madonna and her eight-piece band and core of dancers celebrated their durability. “Into the Groove,” an early hit, was remixed with a more complex beat, rapping interludes from a recorded Missy Elliott and, strangely, a live bagpiper and drum corps. “Like a Prayer,” part of her disco folk set, swelled with spiritual uplift with the help of a recorded gospel choir.
Unlike her dark and condensed “Drowned World” tour in 2001, this outing joyfully interchanged past with present. The best moments blurred images and toyed with mixed messages.
She and her dancers performed “Express Yourself,” an infectious dance pop statement of individuality, dressed in military gear and twirling rifles. For “Burning Up,” her earliest dance hit, and “Material Girl,” Madonna posed as a serious guitar rocker, hitting chords and transforming the songs’ adolescent whine into adult certitude.
The flow of imagery had its chinks when Madonna revisited weaker material — notably “Hanky Panky,” a vaudeville jazz send-up from “Dick Tracy.” And no matter what you think of Andrew Lloyd Webber, his material (“Lament”) doesn’t sound good being sung when the singer is strapped to a fake electric chair.
Unlike the past, the show was not designed to provoke but was filled with more moments where she tried to present herself as a serious songwriter.
She slipped into that mode during the show’s third act, a short acoustic set that ended with a cover of John Lennon’s “Imagine.” The choice may have been in protest, since Clear Channel Entertainment, her tour’s producer and promoter, is the same company that banned the song from its 1,200 radio stations after Sept. 11.But since she was singing in front of a backdrop of televised starving children, it’s more likely she was using the song to signal her altruism. Her shrill rendition didn’t do that. Instead, it felt like another reinvention, just that this one was empty and presumptuous.
source : dailyherald.com

Comments

Yakov climbs to No 6

Madonna’s new book “Yakov and the seven Thieves” climbs to #6 on NY Times children’s picture book chart .
source : nytimes

Comments

Schlesinger blamed heart failure on Madonna

John Schlesinger, the Oscar-winning director of Billy Liar and Midnight Cowboy, blamed Madonna’s “outrageous” behaviour on the set of a film they were making for contributing to his heart attack.
His damning comments about the pop singer turned actress are contained in a collection of letters and production notes bequeathed to the British Film Institute by the veteran film-maker after his death in July 2003.
The papers reveal that Schlesinger, who worked with Madonna in 1999 on his last film, The Next Best Thing (released in 2000), became enraged by her attempts to change numerous scenes. They also show that Madonna demanded that special effects be used to “beautify” her appearance.
In the film, a comedy, Madonna plays a yoga instructor who becomes pregnant after a drunken one-night stand with her homosexual best friend, played by Rupert Everett.
Shortly after completing what was one of the unhappiest shoots of his career, Schlesinger, then 73, collapsed on the doorstep of his London home. He was diagnosed with heart failure and underwent a quadruple heart bypass operation.
His workload before he was admitted to hospital had been particularly heavy and he had complained of being “exhausted” before he left Los Angeles at the end of the film shoot.
In a letter written from the Royal Brompton Hospital on December 2, 1999, to Andrew Cannava, his agent, however, Schlesinger put some of the blame for his collapse on Madonna’s collaboration with Tom Rosenberg, the film’s producer, to change the film.
“I am f***ing angry with Tom being influenced by Madonna,” Schlesinger wrote. “We have tried all of these changes before . . . I do not for one moment think that their behaviour has not added to the reasons I have ended up here.”
His letters, along with his production notes, complain that Madonna tried to influence every aspect of the production, from the music to the final cut.
One unsigned memo suggests that the actress, then 41, wanted producers to “beautify” 34 shots of her with computer generated imagery, the special effects technique pioneered in fantasy epics such as Jurassic Park and Titanic. It appears that the money was eventually found to improve just nine of the scenes.
Surprisingly, the singer, who appeared naked in her controversial 1992 book Sex, also balked at the idea of appearing fully nude in the film. An unsigned memo which relates to production meetings held in 1998 states: “Madonna doesn’t want her bare arse to be seen.”
Later, Madonna lobbied for the removal of a pivotal scene which she felt was too “gay”, much to the disgust of Schlesinger, who was himself homosexual.
These constant demands infuriated the director, who had previously worked with such actors as Lord Olivier, Dustin Hoffman and Glenda Jackson. In a letter to Mr Rosenberg on November 30, 1999, dictated from his hospital bed, he wrote: “I am outraged that Madonna is starting to express an opinion of what works and what doesn’t and what is too gay when she wasn’t even present at the previews. In any case, she is not the director; so far as I am concerned I want the scene to remain as it is.”
He also complained to Sherry Lansing, the head of Paramount, saying: “I am lying here feeling very frustrated because the completion of the film is taking place without me and it seems to me that Tom Rosenberg is very much listening to Madonna’s opinion, which is affecting the cut and the choice of music.”
One handwritten six-page letter from Madonna, who was also executive producer of the film’s soundtrack, to Schlesinger in July 1999 reveals that she lobbied hard for the inclusion of particular kinds of music in the film itself.
She claims that she does “not mean to be presumptuous” or to “overstep the bounds”, before outlining the case for more Indian- influenced music in the film. After reminding the director that she does have a “lot of experience” in the field of film scores, she urges him to listen to a selection of tracks that she has put on a CD.
“Even if you don’t like the music perhaps it will inspire you and get your gears going . . . Please listen in a quiet place with no interruptions. Turn off the phone, light a candle and think about the love story of Robert and Abbie and their world and sadness and the hope. Enjoy. I hope to hear from you soon.” She signs off: “All My Love, M xxx.”
The Next Best Thing, which cost $25 million (P13.5 million) to make, was a commercial and artistic disaster, taking just $23 million worldwide. Madonna’s performance was savaged by critics and earned her a “Golden Raspberry” award for worst actress. Entertainment Weekly said that she could “barely muster even the rudiments of human expression” and urged her to “quit while she is behind”.
Schlesinger was discharged from hospital in January, 2000. The following December he suffered a debilitating stroke. His condition grew steadily worse until he was admitted to hospital in Palm Springs last July. He died a year ago, aged 77.
Liz Rosenberg, Madonna’s publicist, said last week that she was surprised by Mr Schlesinger’s remarks: “People say many, many things about Madonna but no one has ever questioned her level of professional behaviour. I know Madonna had great respect for John Schlesinger as a director. I believe that John Schlesinger had control over this film and Madonna behaved as a salaried actress.”
A spokesman for Mr Rosenberg said that the producer had found it an “honour to work with Mr Schlesinger who he had considered to be one of the greatest directors in the history of the movie business”.
source : telegraph.co.uk

Comments

Making-up Madonna

The UK edition of hello! magazine (Issue 824 – July 13 2004) features an article on make-up artist Laura Mercier: A meeting with famed photographer Steven Meisel meant that Laura Mercier was soon in demand in America and a move to New York soon became a necessity. ‘It was also Steven who helped me to make my name,’ she says. He also introduced Laura to her very first, very famous client, Madonna.
‘I was so frightened of working with her that I put it off for two years, but eventually went to her New York apartment to meet her,’ Laura explains. ‘I was so very nervous, but you know what? She is totally professional, totally inspirational and she pushes the people around her to be as creative as she is. We ended up getting along so well that I worked with her on every video, magazine cover, album photoshoot and red-carpet event for eight years.’
Laura started working with Madonna on her Take A Bow video shoot and never looked back. ‘I found her completely wonderful to work with and always so compelling.’
So when Laura decided to launch her own make-up range in 1996, she was delighted that Madonna allowed her to name a classic red lipstick after her. ‘I remember I had my laboratory mix for the perfect burgundy-red lip colour for her, and then got them to pour it into an antique lip case for her birthday. She was delighted and said that I should name it after her. That was how ‘M’ was born. It was my gift to her, and her gift to me.’
Madonna’s other gift to Laura was a supreme boost to her confidence. ‘Once you have worked with her you realise that you can do your job well. But at the end of the day, it is not about the make-up artist, it is about the person being made up. And to this day I like to work with people whose company I really enjoy.’
source : madonnalicious.com

Comments

A family affair in Chicago

Even though Madonna couldn’t make time for a stop in her hometown of Detroit this tour it isn’t stopping Madonna’s family from attending one of the shows. Members of the Ciccone family will be attending the Sunday 11 July show in Chicago….wonder if she will invite her Dad on stage again like in previous tours?
source : madonnalicious.com

Comments
Top